<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="lyceum/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenJDK to replace IcedTea in Fedora 9</title>
	<link>http://developer.redhatmagazine.com/2008/03/12/openjdk-to-replace-icedtea-in-fedora-9/</link>
	<description>Dev Fu: Mystic Developer Arts</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://lyceum.ibiblio.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Fedora 9 (final) released! &#171; Geek Next Door</title>
		<link>http://developer.redhatmagazine.com/2008/03/12/openjdk-to-replace-icedtea-in-fedora-9/#comment-84931</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://developer.redhatmagazine.com/2008/03/12/openjdk-to-replace-icedtea-in-fedora-9/#comment-84931</guid>
					<description>[...] OpenJDK: JDK 6 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] OpenJDK: JDK 6 [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Kofler</title>
		<link>http://developer.redhatmagazine.com/2008/03/12/openjdk-to-replace-icedtea-in-fedora-9/#comment-68126</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://developer.redhatmagazine.com/2008/03/12/openjdk-to-replace-icedtea-in-fedora-9/#comment-68126</guid>
					<description>java-1.6.0-openjdk is actually icedtea6. There's no encumbered stuff in those packages. And even pure upstream OpenJDK doesn't require encumbered stuff to build anymore, all icedtea6 does is add replacements for some missing stuff (plugin, jnlp etc.). So rest assured that there are no non-Free binary blobs in Fedora's java-1.6.0-openjdk packages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>java-1.6.0-openjdk is actually icedtea6. There&#8217;s no encumbered stuff in those packages. And even pure upstream OpenJDK doesn&#8217;t require encumbered stuff to build anymore, all icedtea6 does is add replacements for some missing stuff (plugin, jnlp etc.). So rest assured that there are no non-Free binary blobs in Fedora&#8217;s java-1.6.0-openjdk packages.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: i, quaid &#8250; Fedora at Sun&#8217;s Community One event</title>
		<link>http://developer.redhatmagazine.com/2008/03/12/openjdk-to-replace-icedtea-in-fedora-9/#comment-67764</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://developer.redhatmagazine.com/2008/03/12/openjdk-to-replace-icedtea-in-fedora-9/#comment-67764</guid>
					<description>[...] From the cool pool of existing presentations, I&#8217;ll be cooking up one that focuses on developers &#8212; why Fedora is of interest to them as developer/users, and more importantly, why it is of interest as a contributor. You can be sure that OpenJDK 6 in Fedora is going to be a big focus. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] From the cool pool of existing presentations, I&#8217;ll be cooking up one that focuses on developers &#8212; why Fedora is of interest to them as developer/users, and more importantly, why it is of interest as a contributor. You can be sure that OpenJDK 6 in Fedora is going to be a big focus. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alexandre Oliva</title>
		<link>http://developer.redhatmagazine.com/2008/03/12/openjdk-to-replace-icedtea-in-fedora-9/#comment-59413</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://developer.redhatmagazine.com/2008/03/12/openjdk-to-replace-icedtea-in-fedora-9/#comment-59413</guid>
					<description>So, for someone who believed Fedora was a means to achieve software freedom and would like to keep on using icedtea, what's the suggestion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, for someone who believed Fedora was a means to achieve software freedom and would like to keep on using icedtea, what&#8217;s the suggestion?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Russell Harrison</title>
		<link>http://developer.redhatmagazine.com/2008/03/12/openjdk-to-replace-icedtea-in-fedora-9/#comment-58353</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://developer.redhatmagazine.com/2008/03/12/openjdk-to-replace-icedtea-in-fedora-9/#comment-58353</guid>
					<description>I'm glad to see OpenJDK coming along so quickly.  I honestly didn't expect to see it for at least another six months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see OpenJDK coming along so quickly.  I honestly didn&#8217;t expect to see it for at least another six months.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
